Complexity of Power Default Reasoning

نویسندگان

  • Guo-Qiang Zhang
  • William C. Rounds
چکیده

This paper derives a new and surprisingly low complexity result for inference in a new form of Reiter’s propositional default logic [18]. The problem studied here is the default inference problem whose fundamental importance was pointed out by Kraus, Lehmann, and Magidor [12]. We prove that “normal” default inference, in propositional logic, is a problem complete for co-NP(3), the third level of the Boolean hierarchy [4]. Our result (by changing the underlying semantics) contrasts favorably with a similar result of Gottlob [7], who proves that standard default inference is P2 -complete. Our inference relation also obeys all of the laws for preferential consequence relations set forth by Kraus, Lehmann, and Magidor. In particular, we get the property of being able to reason by cases and the law of cautious monotony. Both of these laws fail for standard propositional default logic. The key technique for our results is the use of Scott’s domain theory to integrate defaults into partial model theory of the logic, instead of keeping defaults as quasiproof rules in the syntax. In particular, reasoning disjunctively entails using the Smyth powerdomain.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Experimenting with Power Default Reasoning

In this paper we explore the computational aspects of Propositional Power Default Reasoning (PDR), a form of non-monotonic reasoning which the underlying logic is Kleene’s 3-valued propositional logic. PDR leads to a concise meaning of the problem of skeptical entailment which has better complexity characteristics than the usual formalisms (co-NP(3)-Complete instead [[p-Complete). We take advan...

متن کامل

Model-Preference Default Theories

Most formal theories of default inference have very poor computational properties, and are easily shown to be intractable, or worse, undecidable. We are therefore investigating limited but efficiently computable theories of default reasoning. This paper defines systems of Propositional Model-Preference Defaults, which provide a true modeltheoretic account of default inference with exceptions. T...

متن کامل

Different Task Complexity Factors and Cognitive Individual ‎Differences: The Effects on EFL Writers’ Performance

This study aimed at examining the main and interaction effects of increased intentional reasoning demands, planning time, and also language learning aptitude on syntactic complexity, accuracy, lexical complexity, and fluency (CALF) of 226 EFL learners’ performance on letter writing tasks. The participants were first randomly assigned to three experimental groups to be given a task with differin...

متن کامل

Proof Complexity of Propositional Default Logic

Default logic is one of the most popular and successful formalisms for non-monotonic reasoning. In 2002, Bonatti and Olivetti introduced several sequent calculi for credulous and skeptical reasoning in propositional default logic. In this paper we examine these calculi from a proof-complexity perspective. In particular, we show that the calculus for credulous reasoning obeys almost the same bou...

متن کامل

Reasoning with power defaults

This paper introduces power default reasoning (PDR), a framework for nonmonotonic reasoning based on the domain-theoretic idea of modeling default rules with partial-information in a higher-order setting. PDR lifts a non-monotonic operator at the base (syntactic) level to a well-behaved, almost monotonic operator in the higher-order space of the Smyth power-domain – effectively a space of sets ...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 1997